BANKRUPTCY LAW: Where creditor claimed to be owner of property pursuant to foreclosure sale, he was not a “secured creditor,” and thus not entitled to relief from the automatic stay, based on 11 USC 362 (d) (4). Bankruptcy Appellate Panel REVERSES trial court ruling (In re Gigi Ellis, 9th Circuit BAP, Issued 11/19/14, San Francisco)
Subscribe

Hearthstone Legal Group Newsletter
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
You have Successfully Subscribed!
Recent Posts
Dischargeability, Criminal Behavior, & FTX Trading, Ltd.
By Herbert WigginsIn bankruptcyApril 20, 2023Dischargeability, Criminal Behavior, & FTX […]Bankruptcy Law: Dischargeability
By Herbert WigginsIn bankruptcy, BANKRUPTCY LAWApril 6, 2023Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the bankruptcy […]Real Estate/Bankruptcy
By Herbert WigginsIn bankruptcy, Real EstateMarch 23, 2023Whether a real estate agent sold her rights to her […]