BANKRUPTCY LAW: Where creditor claimed to be owner of property pursuant to foreclosure sale, he was not a “secured creditor,” and thus not entitled to relief from the automatic stay, based on 11 USC 362 (d) (4). Bankruptcy Appellate Panel REVERSES trial court ruling (In re Gigi Ellis, 9th Circuit BAP, Issued 11/19/14, San Francisco)
Recent Posts
SCOTUS: Violating Bankruptcy Discharge Serves Up Creditor for Contempt
By Herbert WigginsIn UncategorizedJune 24, 2022The primary purpose of the bankruptcy stay [11 USC […]BANKRUPTCY LAW: The Curious Case of Alex Jones & InfoWars
By Herbert WigginsIn bankruptcy, BANKRUPTCY LAW, creditorsJune 10, 2022Bankruptcy is a legal proceeding that liquidates […]Jurisdiction And Precedential Effect
By Herbert WigginsIn bankruptcy, BANKRUPTCY LAWMay 20, 2022JURISDICTION AND PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT: The bankruptcy […]