AUTOMATIC STAY: The Bank froze the debtor’s accounts after the filing of the bankruptcy, and notified the trustee and the debtor. The bank did not use the funds as a set off for any debt. This is sometimes referred to as an administrative hold upon the debtor’s account. The court held that this action, all by itself, did not constitute a violation of the automatic stay; the bank requested information from the trustee, after making the trustee aware of the freeze on the account. The trustee did not respond. The actions of the bank constituted no violation of law. Mwangi v. Wells Fargo Bank 764 F.3d 1168 (CA9, 2014)
Hearthstone Legal Group Newsletter
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
- THE HOME LOAN WAS DIVISIBLE AND UNBARREDBy Herbert WigginsIn UncategorizedNovember 25, 2023A recent case shows the potential for interplay […]
- Under Recent Law, Even Debts Based on Alleged Malicious Conduct Can be Discharged.By Herbert WigginsIn UncategorizedOctober 17, 2023In 2019, Congress passed the Small Business […]
- Fraudulent Transfer: Bankruptcy Court Combines California and Federal Statutes, and Allows Trustee to Undo a Fraudulent SaleBy Herbert WigginsIn UncategorizedOctober 5, 2023In 2010, a California property developer, Momentum, […]